<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Efficiency, not horsepower</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.swimwellblog.com/archives/147/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.swimwellblog.com/archives/147</link>
	<description>The Blog of Terry Laughlin</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:38:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Terry Laughlin</title>
		<link>http://www.swimwellblog.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Laughlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 03:06:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swimwellblog.com/?p=147#comment-11</guid>
		<description>I got the figures from an article in Nov 2007 issue of Popular Mechanics which related the design work done by a team of engineers from DARPA, the Defense Dept&#039;s technical arm. They&#039;d been tasked with designing a new swim foil for the Navy Seals. They studied human swimmers and compared them with dolphins, calculating the mechanical efficiency (conversion of horsepower into forward motion) of humans at 3% -- 40% lower than the conservative figure I put into the blog as compared to an 80% estimate for the efficiency of dolphins. This struck me as credible because I&#039;d seen a previous estimate by the Univ of Buffalo for the efficiency of elite swimmers at 9%. 
They also said the primary difference observed between humans and dolphins was the dolphins far superior capacity for &quot;active streamlining.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got the figures from an article in Nov 2007 issue of Popular Mechanics which related the design work done by a team of engineers from DARPA, the Defense Dept&#8217;s technical arm. They&#8217;d been tasked with designing a new swim foil for the Navy Seals. They studied human swimmers and compared them with dolphins, calculating the mechanical efficiency (conversion of horsepower into forward motion) of humans at 3% &#8212; 40% lower than the conservative figure I put into the blog as compared to an 80% estimate for the efficiency of dolphins. This struck me as credible because I&#8217;d seen a previous estimate by the Univ of Buffalo for the efficiency of elite swimmers at 9%.<br />
They also said the primary difference observed between humans and dolphins was the dolphins far superior capacity for &#8220;active streamlining.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Munatones</title>
		<link>http://www.swimwellblog.com/archives/147/comment-page-1#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Munatones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.swimwellblog.com/?p=147#comment-10</guid>
		<description>How did you calculate the horsepower of a swimmer (i.e., &quot;...most human swimmers convert 5% or less of their horsepower into forward propulsion...&quot;)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did you calculate the horsepower of a swimmer (i.e., &#8220;&#8230;most human swimmers convert 5% or less of their horsepower into forward propulsion&#8230;&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
